16 (plus DC) down, 34 to go

by Philip Yabut in


 

Today, Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn signed marriage equality into law, making his state the 16th to legalize same-sex marriage.  Religious groups have pledged to challenge the law in court, but barring any judicial setbacks, gay couple will be able to obtain marriage licenses starting on June 1, 2014.

Last week, Hawaii became the 15th state to adopt marriage equality when Gov. Neil Abercrombie signed it into law.  And in October, gay marriage became legal in New Jersey when Gov. Chris Christie dropped an appeal challenging a court ruling it constitutional in light of June's Supreme Court's decision invalidating the Defense of Marriage Act.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut@prylaw.com

 


Marriage Equality Arrives in Rhode Island

by Philip Yabut in


"capitol couple" by author Today, Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee (I) signed two bills legalizing same-sex marriage on the steps of  the state capitol in Providence.  With that stroke of a pen, Rhode Island becomes the tenth state (plus DC) to accept marriage equality under the law.  Same-sex couples will be able to marry beginning on August 1, while those who already are joined under the old civil union statute will be able to change their status to married.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


DOMA and Immigrant Status

by Philip Yabut in


"capitol couple" by author The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex unions even if they are legal in any of the states.  The most well-known effects of this legislation are that gay couples cannot file joint income tax returns, do not have automatic rights of hospital visitation or inheritance, cannot be automatic beneficiaries for pension or insurance plans, and so much more.  In fact, there are at least 1,138 different automatic rights and privileges afforded to legally married heterosexual couples that the DOMA denies to same-sex marriages or civil unions.

The Washington Post recently published a story of one of the more little-known effects of DOMA: a lesbian couple legally married in Washington, DC, that may be separated by the law because one of the spouses has an expiring student visa.  Normally, a citizen spouse in a bi-national marriage can automatically sponsor the immigrant spouse for a green card.  Since the federal government does not recognize same-sex unions, the effect is that the immigrant spouse would have to return to his/her home country unless they can find another way to stay in the United States.  The Family Equality Council estimates that around 36,000 couples (46% of which have children) are affected by this rule.

In September, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano issued a directive recognizing binational same-sex couples as families and placing them on "low priority" status for deportation proceedings.  This action was lauded by LGBT rights advocates as a step in the right direction.  A more permanent solution, of course, would be a complete repeal of DOMA, which is currently on the Supreme Court docket this term.

Read more: Immigration Laws & Same-Sex Couples from Marriage Equality USA (MarriageEquality.org).

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.


News Update: Marriage Equality Ahead in Three States

by Philip Yabut in


Besides high-profile presidential and congressional elections, three states -- Maryland, Maine and Washington state -- are voting on whether to legalize same-sex marriage.  In all three states, supporters of marriage equality are leading in varying degrees.   A fourth state, Minnesota, has a constitutional gay marriage ban on its ballot.

In Maryland, the governor signed a law legalizing same-sex marriage, but the measure is up for a referendum next month.  A recent poll showed that the those in favor upholding the law are ahead 52% to 43% of likely voters.

Like Maryland, Washington's governor signed a law legalizing gay marriage, but the measure is appearing on the ballot as Referendum 74.  A recent poll showed that marriage equality is leading 56.3% to 35.6%, with 6.1% undecided.

In Maine, the measure is up for a vote as a "citizen's initiative," and a recent poll showed support for marriage equality is leading 55% to 39%, with 4.5% undecided.

Unlike those three states, Minnesota has a ballot initiative for a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.  This race is extremely tight in a state that is widely depicted as liberal, with 47% in favor of the ban 46% opposed.

Up to this point, every single state ballot measure banning same-sex marriage has passed.  This year promises to be different, and possibly the start of a trend going the other way.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.


In the news: DNC moves forward with same-sex marriage

by Philip Yabut in ,


This morning (9/4/2012), the fight for marriage equality took another step forward when the Democratic National Committee became the first major political party to adopt same-sex marriage as part of its official platform:

We support the right of all families to have equal respect, responsibilities, and protections under the law. We support marriage equality and support the movement to secure equal treatment under law for same-sex couples. We also support the freedom of churches and religious entities to decide how to administer marriage as a religious sacrament without government interference. We oppose discriminatory federal and state constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny equal protection of the laws to committed same-sex couples who seek the same respect and responsibilities as other married couples. We support the full repeal of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act and the passage of the Respect for Marriage Act.

See the entire DNC platform here (opens in PDF reader).

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.


From one newlywed to another...

by Philip Yabut in


Congratulations to Rep. Barney Frank and Jim Ready!  They got married on July 7, less than a week after my wife and I tied the knot.  Rep. Frank became the first Member of Congress to be wed in a legal same-sex ceremony, yet another step forward for the cause of marriage equality.

Mazel tov!

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.


Evolution

by Philip Yabut in ,


At around 3:00 pm on May 9, 2012, Barack Obama became the first U.S. president to openly endorse same-sex marriage.  The president made his views known in an interview with Robin Roberts of ABC News after days of pressure from LGBT groups following similar public pronouncements from Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan over the weekend.  A day earlier, North Carolina voters endorsed a state constitutional amendment banning gay unions, making it a busy time for the same-sex marriage debate.

Arguably, the president's declaration of support for gay marriage after famously saying his views were "evolving" back in 2010 will have the biggest impact in the debate.  With North Carolina's vote, 31 states now have laws banning same-sex marriage.  Only six states and DC have legalized gay marriage, while five others have civil union statutes in force.  Maine, New Jersey, Maryland and Minnesota will vote on legalizing same-sex marriage later this year.  Obama's announcement has been hailed by LGBT groups and denounced by heterosexual marriage proponents, which should galvanize both sides as the battle rages on.

It's worth noting that a weekend Gallup poll found 50 percent support of gay marriage nationwide, a dramatic shift from just a few years ago when it was not politically expedient to come out in favor of it.  The trend line is clear -- gay marriage is making steady progress in public support.  As with other civil rights struggles in our history, the law generally lags behind public opinion.   But eventually it catches up, and now it may be possible foresee a future where gay Americans can enjoy the same right to marry the people they love just like everyone else.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.


When Breaking Up Is REALLY Hard to Do -- An Article on Same-Sex Divorce

by Philip Yabut in , ,


Divorce is a process that is almost, if not just, as old as marriage itself.  In the U.S., it was once fairly difficult to end a marriage, but once states began formalizing uncontested divorce procedures it became a lot easier and less expensive.  Of course, that is true only for marriages between a man and a woman.

The Washington Post's Ellen McCarthy writes:

"[Port v. Cowan] represents just one of the many blind spots in the legal infrastructure of same-sex marriage in America. Couples often have different rights when they cross jurisdictional lines and may not have the same status in the eyes of the federal government as they do in their home states. The laws are constantly evolving and election-year politics promise to heighten the already divisive passion surrounding the issue."

Port v. Cowan (link leads to a video of oral argument in the Maryland Court of Appeals), nicely summarized by The Baltimore Sun, is a divorce that would be a matter of a few minutes in court followed by a one-line declaration by a judge and a short decree declaring the parties are separated by law.  But for gay couples that go sour, the country's current patchwork of same-sex marriage and divorce laws makes something that most people take for granted a more difficult proposition.

If you live in a state that has already legalized same-sex marriage and/or recognizes such unions from other states, divorce is as simple as following the rules.  However, if you don't live in such a state and you need to separate from your spouse, the best way to protect your rights is to sign a binding property settlement agreement with your spouse, as well as rewriting your will and creating new beneficiary arrangements for insurance purposes, and that's just for starters.  Simply put, you would need to manually sever as many ties as you can with your spouse with separate instruments to gain the same effect that a divorce does automatically.

It is difficult enough, especially during an emotionally stressful time like a separation, to have to deal with jumping through legal hoops.  But it is better to safeguard your rights.  And maybe someday the law will catch up so all of it will become unnecessary.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.