Wills vs. Living Trusts

by Philip Yabut in


A common and basic estate planning dilemma involves choosing whether to create a living trust or to write a will. These two instruments are similar because they create mechanisms for the distribution of property after death. But they have very different structures and uses, which are important to note when creating an estate plan.

When determining whether to use a trust or a will (or some combination thereof) to distribute assets, you should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each instrument.

WILLS

Advantages:

1. Less expensive on the front end. It typically costs more to set up a trust than to draft and execute a will.

2. Governing law. The law of wills has more protections in place for probated estates than laws governing trusts.

3. Time limit for creditors. The probate court sets a deadline for creditors to make claims on an estate.

4. Maintain title on property. There is no need to transfer title of property to another entity to make a will valid.

Disadvantages:

1. Public record. Upon death, your will is filed in probate court and is available for anyone to view.

2. Expensive probate. Probate can be both slow and costly.

3. Incapacity of testator. A will is only effective upon death, and cannot create mechanisms if the testator were to become mentally or physically incapacitated.

4. Multiple probate proceedings for out-of-state property. If you die with property outside the state where the will is effective, that property must be probated separately in that state.

5. Loss of control over fiduciaries/guardians. While you can nominate your own fiduciaries and guardians in a will, the probate court ultimately has the final say and has the discretion to ignore the testator's wishes if he/she believes it's in the best interest of the estate or children.

LIVING TRUSTS

Advantages: 

1. Avoid probate. Living trusts dispose of property like wills, but without the money and time costs associated with probate.

2. Incapacity of trustee. A living trust can immediately transfer property to someone else in the event of mental or physical incapacity without a court order.

3. Privacy. Unlike a will, a trust instrument is not a public document.

4. Out-of-state property. There is no need to probate out-of-state property held in trust.

5. Control over fiduciaries. Since a court is not involved in trust administration, you have complete control over who you name as trustee.

Disadvantages:

1. Initial cost. Unlike creating and executing a will, drafting documents and setting up the trust can be expensive.

2. Loss of ownership of trust property. You must relinquish formal title to the property placed in trust to a new entity.

3. No cut-off date for creditors. Creditors do not have a time limit for bringing claims against your trust.

4. No guardians for minors. You cannot designate guardians for minors in a trust.

For individuals and couples with large or complex estates, a good option is to utilize some combination of the two.  A will is highly recommended for anyone with minor children wishing to make a recommendation of guardianship as well as for anyone wanting to distribute property upon their death without losing control of it in their lifetimes. Under the right circumstances, supplementing that will with a living trust can provide you the security of knowing that your wishes will be carried out without interference from a court. Regardless of the approach you choose, be sure you contact an attorney before proceeding because much can go wrong if your trust or will is drafted or executed improperly.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut@prylaw.com


What is a "residuary estate?"

by Philip Yabut in


Generally a will contains three types of property to be distributed: direct bequests (gifts) to specific individuals, property to be held in trust for someone else ("testamentary trusts"), and the residuary estate.

A "residuary estate" contains all of the assets leftover after direct bequests and testamentary trusts.  In other words, it is what remains after you have given everything away to those whom you specify in the will.  Furthermore, any specific bequests that lapse before you die (for example, gifts to specific people who die before you do) automatically pass into the residuary estate.

In the probate process, all taxes, administrative fees, and creditors' claims are paid out of the residuary estate before it passes to your named beneficiary or beneficiaries in the will.  Therefore, if you have precious family heirlooms or other items that you want other people to have after you die, it is important to specify them as gifts to keep them safe from probate.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut@prylaw.com


Limits on wills

by Philip Yabut in


A will can give peace of mind by determining how your assets will be distributed after you die.  However, there are limits on what property a will can cover.  Assets that cannot be subject to a will include:

  • Property held in joint tenancy with right of survivorship.  This generally affects married couples, but anyone can acquire and own property jointly.  A right of survivorship means that if one co-owner dies, the other automatically takes over the other's share.

  • Pensions, retirement, life insurance, and other accounts that have right of survivorship and/or named beneficiaries.  These accounts already have beneficiary provisions that a will cannot override.  Transfer of ownership would be effective immediately at death and before a will goes through probate.

  • Assets held in trust.  While a will can set aside assets to create a trust, it cannot affect property already held in trust for a named beneficiary.

The common thread in these instruments is the named beneficiary.  In short, a will only can dispose of assets whose ownership would be in question upon death of the testator.  Any will provision that tries to change named beneficiaries for established trusts or payable-on-death accounts is automatically invalid.  Furthermore, payable-on-death and right-of-survivorship assets are not subject to estate taxes.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut@prylaw.com


Where there's no will, there's still a way

by Philip Yabut


"food NOW! food NOW!" by author

"food NOW! food NOW!" by author

When a person dies without a will, state law substitutes and property is distributed according to statute.  This is called "intestate succession."  

In Virginia, if you die with:

  • Children, but no spouse -- children inherit 100%.
  • Spouse, but no children -- spouse inherits 100%.
  • Spouse and children, all of whom are descendants of that spouse -- spouse inherits 100%.
  • Spouse and children, at least one of whom is from someone other than than that spouse -- spouse inherits 1/3, children inherit 2/3.
  • Parents, but no spouse or children -- parents inherit 100%.
  • Siblings, but no spouse or parents -- siblings inherit 100%.

For a complete list of intestate inheritance rules should the decedent have no siblings, parents, spouses or children, see Va. Code § 64.2-200.

In the District of Columbia, if you die with:

  • Children, but no spouse -- children inherit 100%.
  • Spouse, but no children or parents -- spouse inherits 100%.
  • Spouse and children from you and that spouse, and spouse has no other descendants -- spouse inherits 2/3, children inherit 1/3.
  • Spouse and children from you and that spouse, and spouse has descendants from another relationship --  spouse inherits 1/2, your children inherit 1/2.
  • Spouse and children from you and someone other than that spouse -- spouse inherits 1/2, your children inherit 1/2.
  • Spouse and parents -- spouse inherits 3/4, parents inherit 1/4.
  • Parents, but no spouse or children -- parents inherit 100%.
  • Siblings, but no spouse, children or parents -- siblings inherit 100%.

For the complete rules of intestate succession for DC, go to D.C. Code § 19-306§ 19-307§ 19-308§ 19-309§ 19-310§ 19-311, and § 19-312.

Because these are default rules, it is important that you create a will so you do not have the state distributing your property in a manner that is against your wishes.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut@prylaw.com


Presentation: Pendente Lite Orders in Virginia

by Philip Yabut in , , , ,


[slideshare id=24497090&style=border: 1px solid #CCC; border-width: 1px 1px 0; margin-bottom: 5px;&sc=no]

This is a presentation on pendente lite (or temporary) orders in Virginia, which can be obtained while family law cases are being litigated.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


Ore Tenus: The Divorce Hearing

by Philip Yabut in


"the original tweeters" by author You have  negotiated all of the support and child custody issues, divided all of your property to each spouse's satisfaction, and filed all of the necessary paperwork with the court.  You are now at the end of the process, which in Virginia is called the ore tenus hearing.

In Virginia, many uncontested divorces can now be completed without ever setting foot in a courtroom.  However, there are situations where a hearing is necessary (for example, if the defendant spouse is absent and cannot be found).  Assuming there are no issues to be decided, the plaintiff can request the hearing any time after the defendant answers the complaint.

At an ore tenus hearing, the judge listens to testimony from the party asking for divorce and his/her corroborating fact witness.  These questions cover how long the parties have been living separate and apart without cohabitation and without interruption, whether there is intent to remain separate and apart, whether there are support/custody and property issues still in dispute, and if there is any hope for reconciliation.

If there are no issues in dispute, the hearing itself can tend to be less formal than the usual proceeding.  The corroborating witness may be allowed to be present for the petitioner's testimony, and the questions are routine.  The entire proceeding usually lasts around 10 to 15 minutes, and when it is over and the judge signs the decree and the parties are officially divorced.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


"Partial" Divorce in Virginia: "Bed and Board"

by Philip Yabut in


"birds on a vane" by author In a previous post, I wrote that there is no such status as "legally separated" in Virginia.  While this is true, you need to know that there is an intermediate status known as divorce a mensa et thoro, or "divorce from bed and board."

There are two grounds for divorce from bed and board: cruelty and reasonable apprehension of bodily hurt, or willful desertion or abandonment.  The effect of such a decree is separation of spouses and their respective property, but unlike absolute divorce neither party is allowed to remarry (Va. Code § 20-116). 

The parties may seek an absolute divorce one year after date of separation.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


Have you done a Living Will yet?

by Philip Yabut in


"going away" by author Earlier, I wrote about Five Reasons to Get a Living Will.  It's vacation season, and while traveling is fun and relaxing, you should not leave home unprepared for the unthinkable worst case scenario.   If you would like to create a legally enforceable living will, you can contact me directly or do it yourself quickly and easily on my online services page.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


Proving Intent to Divorce: Your Corroborating Witness

by Philip Yabut in


"Wood Duck, P.I." by author In the age of no-fault divorce, it is relatively easy to end a marriage if both sides consent and settle their issues before filing.  But even if both spouses really, really, really want to split up,  someone besides the separating parties must vouch for their intent to divorce under oath and in open court (note: Virginia allows for divorce by affidavit under certain circumstances; DC does not at this time).

Your corroborating witness can be anyone you know -- a relative, friend, colleague.  The court requires the witness to answer a series of questions demonstrating his/her personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances surrounding the plaintiff's separation from his/her spouse and whether the couple has remained separate and apart throughout the required time prior to filing the divorce action.

Virginia's special statewide rules allow both the plaintiff and corroborating witness to answer their questions by written notarized affidavit if  there are no outstanding issues to be determined by a judge.

The following are sample witness questions taken from a divorce guide provided by the Fairfax County Circuit Court:

1. State your full name and address please? 2. Are you acquainted with the Plaintiff in this action? 3. What is your relationship? 4. How long have you known him/her? 5. Does the Plaintiff currently reside at (ADDRESS)? 6. For at least six months prior to filing the Complaint for Divorce, please state all addresses where the Plaintiff has resided. (Note: if it is the other party upon whom jurisdiction is grounded, then ask this question regarding the residency and domicile of the other party.) 7. So for at least six months prior to the filing of the Complaint for Divorce on (DATE), was he/she a bona fide resident and domiciliary of the Commonwealth of Virginia? (Note: if it is the other party upon whom jurisdiction is grounded, then ask this question regarding the residency and domicile of the other party.) 8. Is the Plaintiff currently married to (spouse’s name)? 9. Have you met the Defendant? Would you know him/her by sight? 10. Are both Mr. and Mrs. (NAME) over the age of eighteen? 11. Have either of them been active duty members of the Armed Forces of the United States or its allies at any time during the pendency of this suit? 12. Is it your understanding that they were married on (Date) in (Place)? 13. Were there any children born or adopted of their marriage? (IF YES, ASK NAMES AND AGES) 14. Did they separate on or about (Date)? 15. At the time of the separation, was it the intent of at least one of them that it would be a permanent separation that would ultimately lead to a divorce? 16. Has that intent continued on the part of at least one of them up until the present date? 17. How did you become aware of the separation? 18. Have you had an opportunity to visit in the Plaintiff’s or Defendant’s home since (Date of Separation)? 19. How often have you visited with the Plaintiff/Defendant in his/her home? 20. In any of your visits to his/her home, have you ever seen anything which would indicate to you that his/her spouse was continuing to live there after (Date of Separation)? 21. How frequently do you speak with the Plaintiff/Defendant either by telephone or in person? 22. In any of your conversations with him/her, have you ever heard anything which would indicate to you that after the (Date of Separation), he/she had reconciled with his wife/her husband and resumed living together with her/him? 23. Do you believe you have a close enough relationship with the Plaintiff/Defendant that if he/she had reconciled with his wife/her husband and resumed living with her/him, that you would have been aware of that fact? 24. So, to your knowledge, have they lived separate and apart without any cohabitation and without interruption from (Date of Separation) up to the present date? 25. Do you believe there is any hope or probability of a reconciliation between them?

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


What can be included in spousal support?

by Philip Yabut in ,


"the provider" by author When a marriage ends, there is always the possibility of a significant decrease of income for each party, especially if one of the parties made a lot more money than the other.  The purpose of spousal support (alimony) is to help alleviate the sudden reduction in income for the more disadvantaged party.

Spousal support can be negotiated between the parties or determined by a judge, and it is usually meant to be temporary, ending after a specified term, remarriage by the party receiving payments, or the death of either spouse.  However, a judge can establish permanent support under certain circumstances, such as the supported spouse's inability to become self-supporting.

If the parties cannot reach an agreement for spousal support, the judge is required to take the following factors into consideration, as listed in Va. Code § 20-107.1:

1. The obligations, needs and financial resources of the parties, including but not limited to income from all pension, profit sharing or retirement plans, of whatever nature;

2. The standard of living established during the marriage;

3. The duration of the marriage;

4. The age and physical and mental condition of the parties and any special circumstances of the family;

5. The extent to which the age, physical or mental condition or special circumstances of any child of the parties would make it appropriate that a party not seek employment outside of the home;

6. The contributions, monetary and nonmonetary, of each party to the well-being of the family;

7. The property interests of the parties, both real and personal, tangible and intangible;

8. The provisions made with regard to the marital property under § 20-107.3;

9. The earning capacity, including the skills, education and training of the parties and the present employment opportunities for persons possessing such earning capacity;

10. The opportunity for, ability of, and the time and costs involved for a party to acquire the appropriate education, training and employment to obtain the skills needed to enhance his or her earning ability;

11. The decisions regarding employment, career, economics, education and parenting arrangements made by the parties during the marriage and their effect on present and future earning potential, including the length of time one or both of the parties have been absent from the job market;

12. The extent to which either party has contributed to the attainment of education, training, career position or profession of the other party; and

13. Such other factors, including the tax consequences to each party, as are necessary to consider the equities between the parties.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


Premarital (Prenuptial) Agreements: The Basics

by Philip Yabut in


"not exactly a private moment" by author A premarital agreement, popularly known as a "prenuptial agreement" or "prenup," is a legally binding contract ratified for the purpose of setting terms for the dissolution of a marriage should it occur.  Both Virginia and DC have adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act, setting forth the elements of a prenup in Va. Code § 20-150 and D.C. Code § 46-503.

1. The rights and obligations of each of the parties in any of the property of either or both of them whenever and wherever acquired or located;

2. The right to buy, sell, use, transfer, exchange, abandon, lease, consume, expend, assign, create a security interest in, mortgage, encumber, dispose of, or otherwise manage and control property;

3. The disposition of property upon separation, marital dissolution, death, or the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any other event;

4. Spousal support;

5. The making of a will, trust, or other arrangement to carry out the provisions of the agreement;

6. The ownership rights in and disposition of the death benefit from a life insurance policy;

7. The choice of law governing the construction of the agreement; and

8. Any other matter, including their personal rights and obligations, not in violation of public policy or a statute imposing a criminal penalty.

There is no specific form required for a premarital agreement, and it does not have to contain all of the items listed above.  However, it must be entered into under the rules of a standard contractual relationship and without coercion (see Va. Code § 20-151 and D.C. Code § 46-506).

While an insistence or desire to enter into a prenup may appear to some as a sign of mistrust, please keep in mind that it would solve a lot of potential problems and emotional distress in the future should something go wrong in the marriage.  And on a more basic level, it can help a couple be open as to what they expect of each other.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Philip R. Yabut, Esq. || 1100 N. Glebe Road, Suite 1010, Arlington, VA 22201 || (571) 393-1236 || pyabut01@gmail.com


The Law Defined: Physical Custody

by Philip Yabut in


"sticking together" by author In a previous post, we briefly discussed the two types of child custody (legal and physical).  Here, we will go into physical custody in-depth.

Physical custody is what it sounds like: the parent with whom the child resides.  This arrangement means that the child's legal residence is with the parent whom the court has granted physical custody.  It also means that the custodial parent has the responsibility to care for the child's immediate day-to-day needs, such as food, clothing, shelter, and entertainment.

Courts may grant sole or joint physical custody.  In sole custody situations, the non-custodial parent is entitled to visitation rights, which can be worked out between the parties or set by the judge based on the best interests of the child.  In a joint custody arrangement, the parents divide their time with the child more-or-less equally.

After the judge signs off on an agreement or rules on the merits, the custody arrangement is final unless there is a finding that a change in circumstances affecting the best interests of the child warrants a modification of the custody order.  All custody orders automatically expire when the child turns 18 (can be extended to age 19 or graduation from high school, whichever comes first).

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Divorce: Property Distribution

by Philip Yabut in


"adult food fight" by author Property division is one of the most contentious elements of a divorce proceeding.  If the parties cannot settle their differences out of court, the judge hears arguments and determines how marital property will be distributed upon the final divorce decree.  The state's overriding property distribution laws determine how much leeway a judge has in this decision.

Ten states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin) use the community property doctrine, which means all marital property is divided 50-50 regardless of circumstances.  Each spouse also maintains their own claims on separate property.  The remaining states (including Virginia) and the District of Columbia use equitable distribution, which gives a judge much more discretion to determine what is a fair division of property.  The final decision does not have to be an even 50-50 split, but what is fair to both parties.  Various court cases over the years have given judges some guidance as to what is considered "fair," but generally speaking, equitable distribution statutes allow judges to consider the facts and be creative.  We will discuss some of these cases in a later post.

Obviously, the best way to deal with property issues is for the parties to settle, saving you the contentiousness and expense of a trial.  And it would be more advangeous to have a pre-marital (pre-nuptial) agreement in place.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Presentation: Introduction to Collaborative Divorce

by Philip Yabut in


[slideshare id=16573189&w=427&h=356&sc=no]

This is a short presentation on the basics of collaborative divorce, an alternative to litigation and mediation.
This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.

Collaborative Divorce: An Introduction

by Philip Yabut in ,


"my talons are sharp" by author In popular culture, divorce depicted as an ugly adversarial process with estranged spouses always dramatically at each other's throats.  Real life is usually never as "exciting" as it is on television, but it is really not that far off.  Divorce can be an ugly adversarial process that takes a lot of time, money and emotional cost.

Back in 1990, a Minneapolis lawyer named Stuart Webb founded the collaborative divorce model.  The process of collaborative divorce is to get both spouses and their attorneys in the same room and work together to hammer out an agreement without going to court.  Instead of the secrecy and strategy of the traditional adversarial setting of a divorce trial, the parties would lay everything on the table and figure out the best way to move forward in as cooperative an atmosphere as possible.

Collaborative divorce uses a different financial model than the traditional adversarial model.  Instead of filing court pleadings and hiring experts as the process drags on, the spouses decide from the beginning who the attorneys, mental health professionals who will act as advisors, and the neutral financial analyst will be before beginning negotiations.  As a result, much of the cost of the divorce will be borne earlier in the process rather than escalating as the trial gets closer. 

Collaborative divorce is a form of alternate dispute resolution, but it is not mediation, which is generally done in conjunction with a traditional adversarial process. 

Further reading: History of Collaborative Divorce from collaborativedivorce.net.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.


Clearing the Air: Losing Child Custody vs. Termination of Parental Rights (Virginia)

by Philip Yabut in , , , ,


"mother and duckling" by author A common misconception in family law is that loss of child custody amounts to a termination of parental rights.  These are very different terms with very different legal consequences:

LOSS/LIMITATION OF CHILD CUSTODY: You lose the physical custody of your child (he/she lives with the other parent full time) and/or the ability to make decisions as to your child's daily care.  However you still have the right to ask for visitation.  You also maintain the right to challenge or change the custody determination at a later date.  You legally still have a say in influencing your child's values, religion, schooling and healthcare, and your child can still automatically inherit from your estate or vice versa absent a will saying otherwise.  And, most importantly, you maintain responsibility to support your child financially (i.e., you are not excused from child support!).

TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS: You lose all of your rights over your child, and with it any right to be involved in your child's life.  Effectively, you are no longer legally recognized as the parent, meaning you have absolutely no rights of visitation, and the child will no longer be able to inherit from you or vice versa absent a will saying otherwise.  This also means you no longer have the responsibility to give the child any financial support.

The bar for court-ordered termination of parental rights is also much higher than a change in custody arrangements.  For custody, a material change in circumstances for either or both parties is necessary.  However, a complete termination can only arise from clear and convincing evidence of abuse and neglect.

While a parent can voluntarily give up custody rights, it is not possible to do the same for parental rights.  That is, you cannot "sign over" your parental rights to the other parent.  Only a court can terminate parental rights, and it will only do so if there is a third person ready to "take over" care and support for the child.  A proceeding for termination of parental rights must start with a petition to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, after which the judge will appoint a guardian ad litem for the child and the Department of Social Services will begin a thorough investigation.

Parental rights are also terminated as a matter of course in adoption cases.  In cases of giving up a child for adoption to a non-relative, your family members also lose rights of visitation and inheritance.

Further information: Virginia Legal Aid Society: Termination of Parental Rights

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.


Presentation: Uncontested Divorce in Virginia

by Philip Yabut in


[slideshare id=15594052&w=476&h=400&sc=no] This presentation is a brief overview of how to proceed with an uncontested divorce in Virginia.

This blog is an advertisement for the Law Office of Philip R. Yabut, PLLC, and the information in this post is not to be construed as legal advice, nor does reading it form an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post confidential information in the comments section.